In Re Marriage of Goberville v. Goberville
Trial court erroneously exercised it discretion where it does not refer to statutory factors, but was largely based on its belief that the temporary schedule was working and the recommendation of the GAL.
In Re Marriage of Guelig v. Guelig
Father did not waive his right to object to wife’s parenting plan when he failed to submit his own plan prior to the scheduling conference.
In Re Marriage of Bernier v. Bernier
Circuit court erred by requiring father to pay 50% of GAL fees in a Wis. Stat. §767.242(5)(b)1.b action.
Landwehr v. Landwehr
Wis. Stat. §767.24(4)(a)2 does not require a court to grant each parent equal placement if the court determines that the placement should be modified.
Lubinski v. Lubinski
Father’s physical placement rights are not transferable and cannot be delegated to his new wife.
Derleth v. Cordova
Circuit court had no authority to prospectively order that Wife not move beyond forty-five miles from the marital home.
Shulka v. Siraji
Trial court could condition mother retaining custody on her moving back to Wisconsin due to unique fact situation.
Gadsby v. Martinez
Modification of custody affirmed where mother had notice that custody was an issue and made no objection so she waived any claim.
Simon v. Wilson
Trial court affirmed for prohibiting mother from consuming alcohol during placement, but reversed for prohibiting her from possessing firearms.
Articles on Buy/Sell Agreements
Books and articles related to buy/sell agreements in divorce cases.