Laribee v. Laribee
Statement that wife’s award under property division is sufficient to pay attorney fees is tantamount to determination that she did not have a need for a contribution.
In Re Marriage of Harris v. Harris
Trial court can not grant attorney fees nunc pro tunc after appeal.
In Re the Marriage of Popp v. Popp
Court properly exercised its discretion by noting H’s cash flow and itemized statement of wife’s attorney.
In re Marriage of Rodak v. Rodak
Contribution award based upon depletion of estate was really designed to make estate whole, so it does not require usual findings associated with fee contribution.
In re Marriage of Guzikowski v. Kuehl
Attorney fees on appeal were properly granted by trial court – even though wife had remarried and her new spouse has income.
In Re Marriage of Gerrits v. Gerrits
Because wife waived claim to attorney fees, her fee arrangement is irrelevant.
Stasey v. Stasey
Court cannot determine and enter a judgment for attorney fees between an attorney and client whom the attorney continues to represent in the divorce action.
Marriage of Van Offeren v. Van Offeren
Order that contemnor pay attorney fees for other party in contempt proceeding affirmed.
In Re Marriage of Doerr v. Doerr
Ordering husband to contribute to wife’s attorney fees and to pay GAL and GAL’s expert affirmed where court found the length of the trial and its complexity were primarily the result of husband’s insistence on litigating custody and related issues despite substantial evidence contrary to his position.
Gardner v. Gardner
Wife’s seeking temporary maintenance violated ยง802.05(1) and entitled husband to attorney fees. This statute does apply in divorce cases.