Hauge v. Hauge
No error in including A/R as asset of dental practice where the amount remained relatively static and they were not included as part of H’s income.
No error in including A/R as asset of dental practice where the amount remained relatively static and they were not included as part of H’s income.
Court properly exercised discretion by treating A/R of husband’s medical practice as income, rather than as property. They cannot be counted as both.
No abuse of discretion in treating accounts receivable as an asset.