Author: case-master

In Re Paternity of Cheyenne D.L.

In case where mother was receiving AFDC, but father was living with her and child and support child: (1) Court has discretion to credit the putative father for support prior to adjudication of paternity (2) “Manifest injustice” test under Schultz v. Ystad does not apply (3) It would be inequitable to require retroactive payments to a time father was already support the child.

Amber J.F. v. Richard B.

Res judicata, collateral estoppel and claim preclusion do not bar a child from bringing an action for paternity where earlier action by mother resulted in jury finding of nonpaternity. Child was not a party to or in privity with mother in earlier action.