In Re Marriage of Weiss v. Weiss
(1) Bonnell rule applies to gifted property. (2) By putting gifted money into joint asset, husband evinced intent to convert the property into a joint asset. (3) Bonnell applies even if the money can be traced.
(1) Bonnell rule applies to gifted property. (2) By putting gifted money into joint asset, husband evinced intent to convert the property into a joint asset. (3) Bonnell applies even if the money can be traced.
Rules for gifts relaxed when parties live in same household.
Engagement ring is a conditional gift. Inquiry into how the engagement was dissolved is not necessary as no-fault policy applies.
Court has discretion to consider gifts as reducing need for maintenance.
Gifts of trust income was gift. Also, trial court’s finding that van was marital is not error: court found wife’s testimony more credible where she testified that she did not recall using the term “gift” in describing the purchase.
A circuit court must separately calculate child support and maintenance as a condition precedent to calculating family support.
Stipulation limiting ability to seek a modification of family support is against public policy and cannot provide a basis for estoppel.
No absolute right to record FCC proceedings.
Circuit court has review authority over all orders of the FCC.
A Family Court Commissioner is expressly authorized under Wisconsin law to initiate actions for remedial contempt to enforce child support obligations. There is no appearance of impropriety.