In Re Marriage of Lellman v. Mott
Sufficient evidence existed to support trial court’s finding that payor enjoyed a substantially higher income than disclosed on financial disclosure.
Sufficient evidence existed to support trial court’s finding that payor enjoyed a substantially higher income than disclosed on financial disclosure.
Military retired pay may be considered as income for purposed of calculating child support.
Repayment by company owned by Raz of a loan to Raz was income available for child support.
When determining the income of the sole owner of a corporation, the court may disregard the labels attached by the owner and consider corporate profits in order the determine the owner’s true income status.
Trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by holding open child support based on wife’s enhanced education benefit.
Trial court property exercised its discretion by ordering child support to be paid from lump-sum backdrop pension payment.
undistributed earnings, these earnings are not available for child support.
A non-cooperative party cannot be heard to complain when a court approximates income available to support.
Court commissioner and trial court incorrectly excluded overtime income as a general policy. Overtime income can be excluded if it would be unfair to the parties or other factors support exclusion.
Settlement from wrongful termination of employment lawsuit was income available for child support.