In Re Marriage of Zimmerman v. Zimmerman
Absence of mortgage does not, per se, translate into imputed income under Wis. Adm. Code sec. HSS 80.02(14)
In Re Paternity of Ashleigh N. H.
(1) Per diem in excess of expenses in income available for child support (2) Court did not abuse its discretion by not adding back depreciation to rental properties (3) Court erred in reducing back support because of lack of visitation and because father started the paternity action – support and visitation are separate issues.
In Re Marriage of Grohmann v. Grohmann
HSS 80 defines gross income as all income from whatever source derived. If husband is obligated to report trust income as is own, then, regardless of whether he receives distributions from the trust, 17% of the trust income is payable as child support.
In Re Marriage of Maley
Where sale price of asset was equal to or less than the value placed on asset at the time of divorce the proceeds of the sale are not income for the purposes of child support.
In Re Marriage of Lellman v. Mott
Sufficient evidence existed to support trial court’s finding that payor enjoyed a substantially higher income than disclosed on financial disclosure.
In Re Marriage of Cook v. Cook
Military retired pay may be considered as income for purposed of calculating child support.
In Re Marriage of Raz v. Brown
Repayment by company owned by Raz of a loan to Raz was income available for child support.
In Re Marriage of Carpenter v. Mumaw
When determining the income of the sole owner of a corporation, the court may disregard the labels attached by the owner and consider corporate profits in order the determine the owner’s true income status.
In Re Marriage of Weiler v. Boerner
Trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by holding open child support based on wife’s enhanced education benefit.
In Re Marriage of Winkler v. Winkler
Trial court property exercised its discretion by ordering child support to be paid from lump-sum backdrop pension payment.