In Re Marriage of Greenwald
Premarital contributions as unmarried cohabitator is not a relevant factor on wife’s maintenance claim.
Premarital contributions as unmarried cohabitator is not a relevant factor on wife’s maintenance claim.
Performing household services does not give rise to claim of unjust enrichment under Watts. Services must be linked to an accumulation of wealth or assets during the relationship.
Unjust enrichment award reversed where parties never held themselves out as husband and wife, maintained separate accounts and filed separate taxes.
Premarital relationship should have been excluded from consideration in maintenance decision. Review granted.
Court can consider premarital cohabitation as a factor in maintenance under §767.26(9) Wis. Stats.
Trial court erred by applying unjust enrichment claim to each parcel of land rather than considering the overall scope of the joint enterprise.
Trial court had no authority to order a financial judgment for cohabitating parties where the only action pled and litigated was whether one party had any interest. The court’s only authority was to partition the property. (Not published, but citable)
Trial court had no authority to order a financial judgment for cohabitating parties where the only action pled and litigated was whether one party had any interest. The court’s only authority was to partition the property. (Not published, but citable)