In Re Marriage of Warren v. Warren
(1) Test for change in circumstances is whether change is foreseeable. (2) If agreement is equitable, it controls regardless of other factors.
In Re Marriage of Webb v. Webb
Marital agreement was intended to apply at divorce, even though it does not expressly so state. Levy distinguished.
In Re Marriage of Greenwald v. Greenwald
Multiple issues. See full summary.
In Re Interest of Z.J.H: Spoerdler v. Hermes
Co-parenting agreement void as against public policy.
In Re Marriage of Gardner v. Gardner
Multiple issues. See full summary.
In Re Marriage of Evenson v. Evenson
Button only applies to agreements made before or during marriage which contemplate a continuation of the marriage relation. Agreement signed after divorce was filed was a divorce stipulation and is controlled by Ray v. Ray, 57 Wis. 2d 77 (1973).
In Re Marriage of Ayres v. Ayres
Postnuptial agreements are treated differently from agreements executed for the purpose of facilitating divorce. In this case, the agreement was made in contemplation of a divorce, it is a stipulation under §767.10(1), Stats. and not a postnuptial agreement.
In Re Marriage of Van Boxtel v. Van Boxtel
An agreement entered into after the commencement of divorce proceedings is a stipulation under Wis. Stat. §767.10(1) and is subject to the approval of the court.
Jones v. Estate of Jones
Homestead protection can be waived in a prenuptial agreement.
In Re Marriage of Polakowski v. Polakowski
Van Boxtel rule applies to post-judgment stipulations.