In Re Marriage of Carpenter v. Mumaw
When determining the income of the sole owner of a corporation, the court may disregard the labels attached by the owner and consider corporate profits in order the determine the owner’s true income status.
In Re Marriage of Weiler v. Boerner
Trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by holding open child support based on wife’s enhanced education benefit.
In Re Marriage of Winkler v. Winkler
Trial court property exercised its discretion by ordering child support to be paid from lump-sum backdrop pension payment.
In Re Marriage of Winters v. Winters
undistributed earnings, these earnings are not available for child support.
In Re Marriage of Derr v. Derr
A non-cooperative party cannot be heard to complain when a court approximates income available to support.
In Re Marriage of Jarman v. Welter
Court commissioner and trial court incorrectly excluded overtime income as a general policy. Overtime income can be excluded if it would be unfair to the parties or other factors support exclusion.
Lyman v. Lyman
Settlement from wrongful termination of employment lawsuit was income available for child support.
Callen v. Callen
Trial court did not have to find shirking to impute income given the flexibility of the father’s income.
Kanehl v. Pitel
Trial court did not have to find shirking to impute income given the flexibility of the father’s income.
Derleth v. Cordova
Although wife failed to preserve argument for appeal, court can exclude fringe benefits for health, dental and vision insurance from husband’s income as he had to maintain this insurance and pay the premiums until the children reached the age of majority.