In Re Paternity of A.S.D.
In calculating gross income, court can add back depreciation. Trial court rejected charging father for equity in residence
In calculating gross income, court can add back depreciation. Trial court rejected charging father for equity in residence
All sources of income are considered in determining child support.
No error by court in including overtime in husband’s income where there is evidence in the record that he earned overtime income on a regular basis.
Absence of mortgage does not, per se, translate into imputed income under Wis. Adm. Code sec. HSS 80.02(14)
(1) Per diem in excess of expenses in income available for child support (2) Court did not abuse its discretion by not adding back depreciation to rental properties (3) Court erred in reducing back support because of lack of visitation and because father started the paternity action – support and visitation are separate issues.
HSS 80 defines gross income as all income from whatever source derived. If husband is obligated to report trust income as is own, then, regardless of whether he receives distributions from the trust, 17% of the trust income is payable as child support.
Where sale price of asset was equal to or less than the value placed on asset at the time of divorce the proceeds of the sale are not income for the purposes of child support.
Sufficient evidence existed to support trial court’s finding that payor enjoyed a substantially higher income than disclosed on financial disclosure.
Military retired pay may be considered as income for purposed of calculating child support.
Repayment by company owned by Raz of a loan to Raz was income available for child support.