Callen v. Callen
Trial court did not have to find shirking to impute income given the flexibility of the father’s income.
Trial court did not have to find shirking to impute income given the flexibility of the father’s income.
Trial court did not have to find shirking to impute income given the flexibility of the father’s income.
Although wife failed to preserve argument for appeal, court can exclude fringe benefits for health, dental and vision insurance from husband’s income as he had to maintain this insurance and pay the premiums until the children reached the age of majority.
Courts look to taxable income when determining ability to pay child support. Therefore, Sub S distributions, including the portion used to pay tax obligations, are properly considered in determining gross income.