In Re Marriage of Monicken v. Monicken
New statute limits court’s authority to modify arrearage. Where parties orally agreed to different support payment, equitable estoppel under Shulz and Harms are no longer available.
Paulhe v. Riley
Payer entitled to credit for support payments made during period where covered by social security disability payments paid to payee for the minor child.
Poehnelt v. Poehnelt
(1) Court can order a party to put up security for future child support if there is a history of arrears. (2) Court cannot order child support past age of majority.
Behnke v. Behnke
Legislature can change child support obligations retroactively.
Gerhardt v. Estate of Moore
Lump sum payment in paternity is res judicata for future support.
In Re Paternity of R.L.M. v. T.J.W.
Two-tiered child support order affirmed.
In Re Paternity of P.J.W.
Child who reaches age of majority does not have cause of action for award or modification of child support.
In Re Marriage of Drier v. Drier
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in holding open child support, even though wife was receiving AFDC.
Gerhardt v. Estate of Moore
On remand from U.S. Supreme Court, Wisconsin Supreme Court decides that lump sum payment for paternity judgment denies equal protection of laws.
In Re Marriage of Ondrasek v. Tenneson
Stipulation waiving or setting cap on child support violated public policy.