State v. Smith


72 Wis. 2d 711, 242 N.W.2d 184 (1976)


If an oral communication is lawfully intercepted because of the consent of a party to the conversation, but is otherwise inadmissible into evidence in a criminal prosecution due to a failure to comply with statutory requirements, such deficiency does not require the additional suppression of the testimony of the consenting participant.

[ Full Opinion ]